6,963 publications from this institution
1. The effects of inhaled nedocromil sodium and sodium cromoglycate on bradykinin‐induced bronchoconstriction have been studied in a double‐ blind, placebo controlled study, in eight mild asthmatic subjects. 2. The subjects attended on four occasions. Fifteen minutes after drug pre‐ treatment a bradykinin challenge was performed. Increasing concentrations were inhaled until a greater than 40% fall in expiratory flow at 30% of vital capacity from a partial flow volume manoeuvre (V p30) was demonstrated. 3. Inhaled bradykinin (0.06‐8.0 mg ml‐1) caused dose‐related bronchoconstriction with the geometric mean cumulative dose causing a 40% fall in V p30 (PD40) of 0.035 (95% CI: 0.02‐0.07) mumol, after placebo inhalation, which was similar to that measured before the trial (0.04: 0.02‐0.09 mumol). 4. Both nedocromil sodium (4 mg) and sodium cromoglycate (10 mg) gave significant protection (P less than 0.05) against bradykinin‐induced bronchoconstriction (PD40 0.37: 0.19‐0.72 mumol after nedocromil sodium and 0.22: 0.11‐0.49 after sodium cromoglycate). 5. Since bradykinin‐induced bronchoconstriction is probably neurally mediated we conclude that both nedocromil sodium and sodium cromoglycate have an action on neural pathways which may be useful in the control of asthma symptoms.
The Bifurcation Academic Research Consortium (Bif-ARC) project originated from the need to overcome the paucity of standardization and comparability between studies involving bifurcation coronary lesions. This document is the result of a collaborative effort between academic research organizations and the most renowned interventional cardiology societies focused on bifurcation lesions in Europe, the United States, and Asia. This consensus provides standardized definitions for bifurcation lesions; the criteria to judge the side branch relevance; the procedural, mechanistic, and clinical endpoints for every type of bifurcation study; and the follow-up methods. Considering the complexity of bifurcation lesions and their evaluation, detailed instructions and technical aspects for site and core laboratory analysis of bifurcation lesions are also reported. The recommendations included within this consensus will facilitate pooled analyses and the effective comparison of data in the future, improving the clinical relevance of trials in bifurcation lesions, and the quality of care in this subset of patients.