Summary A geometrically nonlinear plate model has been developed analytically in order to investigate the buckling behaviour of laminated composite panels containing a centrally located delaminated patch. The panels examined are rectangular and under uniaxial compression. Trigonometric out-of-plane displacement functions are employed in the Rayleigh–Ritz procedure where minimum energy principles are applied to solve for the mechanical behaviour of the plates. The in-plane deformations are determined via von Karman’s compatibility equation by applying restrained edges at the boundary of the delaminated region. Different delamination configurations are investigated with the critical buckling loads and eigenvectors being determined using linear analysis and the results are related to the delamination parameters. Validation of the results is undertaken by comparing against previous work. An indication of residual capacity of the panels after the initial instability is assessed through the results in the postbuckling range. Furthermore, delamination propagation is incorporated via a discrete cohesive zone model which is formulated in order to investigate potential instabilities due to this important mechanism. Several different delamination configurations are studied around the transitional depth, which constitutes the boundary between global and local buckling.
I. Introduction: summary The incidence of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is increasing throughout the world and acts as a major incentive for the development of new and improved drug therapy. However, the cytokine storm caused in human volunteers after administration of TGN1412 (TeGenero, Wu¨rzburg, Germany) has emphasized the need for caution in dose selection in phase I with biologics and the need for predictive assays based on human cells. For first-in-man studies, ex vivo whole blood stimulation can be employed with systemic therapies to establish specific target pharmacology, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling, and an optimal dosage regimen. For the large range of bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory agents entering studies in human, reliable decision making is imperative in phase II before entering large scale phase III clinical studies. In phase II studies, it is important to establish the clinical efficacy and tissue anti-inflammatory properties of the new therapy. Many studies have been performed utilizing the inhaled allergen challenge (IAC) in asthmatics as a proof of concept study, although the latest methods of nasal allergen challenge (NAC) in subjects with allergic rhinitis offer advantages in terms of repeated direct sampling of the nasal lining fluid. Airway hyperreactivity (AHR) is commonly measured as provocative concentration to cause a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (PC20) in relation to methacholine, adenosine monophosphate (AMP), or mannitol. It is also possible to directly study clinical effects of new therapies on limited numbers of symptomatic asthma patients through morning and evening electronic monitoring of lung function and symptoms. Alternative clinical trial designs in asthma include studies to assess bronchodilation and bronchoprotection, exercise tolerance, add-on and titration studies with inhaled and oral corticosteroids, and a considerable recent focus in phase III on prevention and treatment of exacerbations. In contrast, there is a major challenge for the development of new anti-inflammatory drugs for COPD, as phase II studies have been poorly predictive of efficacy in phase III trials, resulting in difficulties for oral phosphodiesterase (PDE)4 inhibitors to achieve registration after large clinicaldevelopment. In COPD, clinical trial designs range from studies on lung function, symptoms and exercise performance, inflammatory biomarkers, natural history of chronic stable disease, prevention and treatment of exacerbations, and effects on the BODE score and cachexia and muscle function. Compared with asthma, inclusion criteria, monitoring parameters, comparator therapies, and trial design are less well established for COPD. The large variety of potential clinical endpoints includes lung function, symptoms, walking tests, hyperinflation, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), frequency and severity of exacerbations, natural history, and mortality. In addition, for both asthma and COPD, surrogate biomarkers may be assessed in blood, exhaled breath, induced sputum, bronchial mucosal biopsy, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), and through advanced radiographic imaging. There have been considerable recent advances in the development of noninvasive biomarkers and novel clinical trial designs, as well as clarification of regulatory requirements, that will facilitate the clinical development of new therapies for patients with asthma and COPD.
This editorial refers to ‘Biolimus-A9 polymer-free coated stent in high bleeding risk patients with acute coronary syndrome: a Leaders Free ACS substudy’, by C.K. Naber et al ., doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw203 Last year, the Leaders Free trial report was perceived in the interventional cardiology community as one of the most clinically relevant studies in recent history.1 The study clearly addressed a high bleeding risk (HBR) population including patients with 13 pre-defined clinical criteria at age ≥75 years or those with co-morbidities such as renal failure and oral anticoagulation therapy. The HBR patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) also possess thrombo-ischaemic risks of stent thrombosis and future atherothrombotic events, which used to pose a clinical dilemma for physicians in the choice of stent type and antithrombotic regimens for HBR patients: a drug-eluting stent (DES) and relatively long dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with additional bleeding risk and decreased ischaemic risk vs. bare-metal stent (BMS) and short DAPT with increased ischaemic (restenotic) risk and less additional bleeding risk.2 The Leaders Free study with 2466 patients provided a solution to the dilemma, demonstrating that the specific biolimus A9-eluting polymer-free stent (BA9-DCS) with a 1-month DAPT was safer and more efficacious than the BMS with the same DAPT regimen, with similar rates of bleeding events. Of note, the subgroup analysis showed that in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the treatment effects of the two devices were different. In this issue of the journal, Naber and colleagues provided further insights into the ACS population from the Leaders Free trials.3 In 659 HBR patients presenting with ACS at entry (BA9-DCS, 330; BM, 329), treatment with BA9-DCS and 1-month DAPT …