6,332 publications from this institution
Thermal barrier coating (TBC) systems are susceptible to delamination failures in the presence of a large thermal gradient. These failures, which occur within the TBC layer, are very different in character from those associated with the thermally grown oxide. Three possible causes of internal delamination are analyzed. In all cases, the thermomechanical properties of the TBC are allowed to vary because of sintering. (a) One mechanism relates to exfoliation of an internal separation in the TBC due to a through thickness heat flux. (b) Another is concerned with edge-related delamination within a thermal gradient. (c) The third is a consequence of sintering-induced stresses. The results of these analyses, when used in combination with available properties for the TBC, strongly suggest that the second mechanism (b) predominates in all reasonable scenarios. Consequences for the avoidance of this failure mode are discussed.
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVArticleNEXTMechanism of thermal decomposition of n-butyl(tri-n-butylphosphine) copper(I)George M. Whitesides, Erwin R. Stedronsky, Charles P. Casey, and Joseph San Filippo Jr.Cite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 5, 1426–1427Publication Date (Print):March 1, 1970Publication History Published online1 May 2002Published inissue 1 March 1970https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja00708a067https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00708a067research-articleACS PublicationsRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views490Altmetric-Citations102LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose Get e-Alerts
Background: Previous studies have examined the association between dairy fat intake and incident Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) by conducting analyses of dairy products stratified by fat content, although data linking dairy fat intake and incident T2D and their substitution for other nutrients are sparse. Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between dairy fat intake and risk of T2D. We assessed the hypothesis that replacing calories from dairy fat for other animal fat or refined carbohydrates will result in modest increases in T2D risk. Methods: We followed up 41,670 men in the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (1986-2010), 84, 685 women in the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS; 1980-2012), and 90,325 women in the NHSII (1991-2011). Diet was assessed every 4 years with the use of validated food-frequency questionnaires, and other health and lifestyle covariates were collected biennially. Dairy fat contents were determined for dairy products and food items that contain dairy. Dairy fat intake from all relevant food items was summed to calculate total intake, which was expressed as percent of total energy. Incident T2D cases were identified by self-reports during follow-up and confirmed by a validated supplementary questionnaire. A time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio for dairy fat intake and T2D risk. Results: During 4,661,518 years of follow-up, we documented 18,298 incident T2D cases. In multivariate models, a 5% increase in energy dairy fat was associated with a 2% risk increase in T2D (RR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.05). In isocaloric substitution models, the replacement of 5% of calories from dairy fat with the equivalent energy from other sources of animal fat or carbohydrate from refined grains was associated with an 7% [RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.09], and a 7% [RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.11] increased risk of T2D, respectively. Conversely, a 5% calorie substitution of carbohydrate from whole grains was associated with 7% lower risk of T2D [RR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.89, 0.97]. Conclusions: In conclusion, dairy fat intake was modestly associated with a higher T2D risk. The replacement of dairy fat with carbohydrates from whole grains may decrease incident T2D risk. Further research is warranted to elucidate the role of other components in dairy products that may contribute to previously reported null associations with T2D.
This study aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of genetic risk models based on risk loci identified and/or confirmed in genome-wide association studies for type 2 diabetes mellitus. A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases through April 13, 2012, and published data relevant to the prediction of type 2 diabetes based on genome-wide association marker-based risk models (GRMs) were included. Of the 1,234 potentially relevant articles, 21 articles representing 23 studies were eligible for inclusion. The median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) among eligible studies was 0.60 (range, 0.55-0.68), which did not differ appreciably by study design, sample size, participants' race/ethnicity, or the number of genetic markers included in the GRMs. In addition, the AUCs for type 2 diabetes did not improve appreciably with the addition of genetic markers into conventional risk factor-based models (median AUC, 0.79 (range, 0.63-0.91) vs. median AUC, 0.78 (range, 0.63-0.90), respectively). A limited number of included studies used reclassification measures and yielded inconsistent results. In conclusion, GRMs showed a low predictive performance for risk of type 2 diabetes, irrespective of study design, participants' race/ethnicity, and the number of genetic markers included. Moreover, the addition of genome-wide association markers into conventional risk models produced little improvement in predictive performance.
An exact asymptotic analysis is presented of the stress and deformation fields near the tip of a quasistatically advancing plane strain tensile crack in an elastic-ideally plastic solid. In contrast to previous approximate analyses, no assumptions which reduce the yield condition, a priori, to the form of constant in-plane principal shear stress near the crack tip are made, and the analysis is valid for general Poisson ratio ν. Specific results are given for ν = 0.3 and 0.5, the latter duplicating solutions in previous work by L.I. Slepyan, Y.-C. Gao and the present authors. The crack tip field is shown to divide into five angular sectors of four different types ; in the order in which these sweep across a point in the vicinity of the advancing crack, they are : two plastic sectors which can be described asymptotically (i.e., as r → 0, where r is distance from the crack tip) in slip-line terminology as ‘constant stress’ and ‘centered fan’ sectors, respectively ; a plastic sector of non-constant stress which cannot be described asymptotically in terms of slip lines; an elastic unloading sector; and a trailing plastic sector of the same type as that directly preceding the elastic sector. Further, these four different sector types constitute the full set of asymptotically possible solutions at the crack tip. As is known from prior work, the plastic strain accumulated by a material point passing through such a moving ‘centered fan’ sector is O(ln r) as r → 0 ; it is proved in the present work that the plastic strain accumulated by a material point passing through the ‘constant stress’ sector ahead of a growing crack must be less singular than In r as r → 0. As suggested also in earlier studies, the rate of increase of opening gap δ at a point currently at a distance r behind, but very near, the crack tip is given for crack advance under contained yielding by δ ̇ = α J ̇ σ0 +β( σ0 E ) a ̇ ln( R r ) where a is crack length, σ0 is tensile yield strength, E is Young's modulus, J is the value of the J-integral taken in surrounding elastic material, and the parameters α and R are undetermined by the asymptotic analysis. The exact solution for ν = 0.3 gives β = 5.462, which agrees very closely with estimates obtained from finite element solutions. An approximate analysis based on use of slip line representations in all plastic sectors is outlined in the Appendix.