No abstract is provided for this article.
Objective Optimal balances of sedentary behaviour, physical activity and sleep (collectively termed movement behaviours) for concussion management remain unknown. We sought to determine the optimal daily distribution of movement behaviours for reducing postconcussion symptom burden in children and adolescents. Methods This secondary analysis of the Paediatric Concussion Assessment of Rest and Exertion (PedCARE) study included participants aged 10 to <18 years with an acute concussion (>48 hours of presenting to emergency department). Health and Behaviour Inventory (HBI) concussion symptoms were measured at a 2-week post-emergency department follow-up. Persisting symptoms after concussion (PSAC) were classified through reliable change in total HBI scores. Movement behaviours were measured with accelerometers over 13 days. For each day of movement behaviours, compositional regression models were built to determine the optimal daily movement behaviours for predicting HBI scores and PSAC probability. Results Analyses included 259 participants (45% female, mean age 13.3 years). Compared with the average, movement behaviours associated with optimal postconcussion outcomes followed a trend of initially more rest (eg, day 2: 11.5 (95% CI 8.8 to 12.7) hours/day of sleep and 8.5 (95% CI 6.5 to 11.3) hours/day sedentary). Optimal patterns also included above-average moderate-to-vigorous physical activity across the 13 days (eg, days 2, 7, 13:0.6 (95% CI 0.2 to 1.2), 1.5 (95% CI 1.2 to 1.7), 1.1 (95% CI 0.2 to 1.7) hours/day, respectively), with increased light physical activity emerging as optimal later in recovery (eg, day 10:5.5 (95% CI 5.0 to 5.8) hours/day). Conclusions This is the first study to use compositional data analyses to identify an optimal distribution of movement behaviours for concussion symptom recovery in children and adolescents. Our results can inform concussion management protocols that balance rest and activity throughout recovery.
Studies examining associations between movement behaviours (i.e. physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep duration) and obesity focus on average values of these movement behaviours, despite important within-country and between-country variability. A better understanding of movement behaviour inequalities is important for developing public health policies and behaviour-change interventions. The objective of this ecologic analysis at the country level was to determine if inequality in movement behaviours is a better correlate of obesity than average movement behaviour volume in children from all inhabited continents of the world.This multinational, cross-sectional study included 6,128 children 9-11 years of age. Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), total sedentary time (SED) and sleep period time were monitored over 7 consecutive days using waist-worn accelerometry. Screen time was self-reported. Inequality in movement behaviours was determined using Gini coefficients (ranging from 0 [complete equality] to 1 [complete inequality]).The largest inequality in movement behaviours was observed for screen time (Gini of 0.32; medium inequality), followed by MVPA (Gini of 0.21; low inequality), SED (Gini of 0.07; low inequality) and sleep period time (Gini of 0.05; low inequality). Average MVPA (h d-1) was a better correlate of obesity than MVPA inequality (r = -0.77 vs. r = 0.00, p = 0.03). Average SED (h d-1) was also a better correlate of obesity than SED inequality (r = 0.52 vs. r = -0.32, p = 0.05). Differences in associations for screen time and sleep period time were not statistically significant. MVPA in girls was found to be disproportionally lower in countries with more MVPA inequality.Findings from this study show that average MVPA and SED should continue to be used in population health studies of children as they are better correlates of obesity than inequality in these behaviours. Moreover, the findings suggest that MVPA inequality could be greatly reduced through increases in girls' MVPA alone.
The aim of this study was to identify the relationship between health-related physical fitness components (aerobic fitness, muscle strength, flexibility, and body fat) and resting heart rate (RHR) in Brazilian adolescents. The study included 695 schoolchildren (14-19 years) from public schools of the city of São José, Brazil. RHR was evaluated using an automated oscillometric sphygmomanometer. Aerobic fitness was assessed by the modified Canadian Aerobic Fitness Test; muscle strength was measured by handgrip dynamometer; flexibility was assessed by the sit-and-reach test; and body fat was assessed indirectly by sum of two skinfold thicknesses (triceps and subscapular). Sociodemographic variables, habitual physical activity, sexual maturation, and body mass index were the covariates. Cardiorespiratory fitness (β = -0.11; 95%CI: -0.14, -0.08) and handgrip strength (β = -0.10; 95%CI: -0.18, -0.01) were inversely associated with RHR in boys. For girls, cardiorespiratory fitness (β = -0.09; 95%CI: -0.12, -0.06) was inversely associated with RHR. In both sexes, body fat (β = 0.50; 95%CI: 0.25, 0.75 for boys; β = 0.17; 95%CI: 0.36, 2.72 for girls) was directly associated with RHR. The RHR is measured more easily than the physical fitness tests, so it is recommended to assess adolescent's heath in large surveillance systems.
No abstract is provided for this article.
Chair, Global Summit on the Physical Activity of Children Active Healthy Kids Canada, established in 1994, is a registered charitable organization that works to power the movement to get kids moving by providing knowledge, insight and understanding that influences thinking and action among issue stakeholders to help them build better programs, campaigns and policies to increase physical activity (PA) among children and youth.This year marks the 20th anniversary of Active Healthy Kids Canada.Since 2005, Active Healthy Kids Canada has prepared, produced and released an annual Report Card on the Physical Activity of Children and Youth (see www.activehealthykids.ca).Each year the Report Card provides a comprehensive overview of the "state of the nation" on how Canada is succeeding in providing PA opportunities for children and youth.The 10th Anniversary Active Healthy Kids Canada Report Card was released in 2014.A failing or unsatisfactory grade for PA has been assigned in Canada every year that the Report Card has been released. 1The most recent data suggest that only 5% of Canadian school children and youth meet minimum PA guidelines. 2,3Similar findings are available in many countries making childhood and youth physical inactivity a global concern 4 with significant implications for future chronic disease.A recent comprehensive analysis of the effects of PA on the global burden of noncommunicable diseases and mortality has estimated that 6% of coronary heart disease cases, 7% of type 2 diabetes, 10% of breast and colon cancers, and 9% of deaths are directly attributable to physical inactivity. 5Consequently, 5.3 million deaths worldwide were attributed to physical inactivity in 2007 6 leading to the conclusion that ". . . in view of the prevalence, global reach, and health effect of physical inactivity, the issue should be appropriately described as pandemic, with far reaching health, economic, environmental, and social consequences". 6(p.67)In Canada alone the annual health care costs attributed to physical inactivity among adults is estimated to be $6.8 billion. 7oncerns over high levels of physical inactivity and obesity and subsequent implications for the development of noncommunicable diseases have been expressed worldwide. 4-10Notably, at the sixtysixth session of the United Nations (September 2011) in New York City, the General Assembly made a political declaration on the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases ". . .with concern [for] the rising levels of obesity in different regions, particularly among children and youth, and note that obesity, an unhealthy diet and physical inactivity have strong linkages with the four main non-
The narrative review by Professor Stamatakis and colleagues1 published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine ( BJSM ) challenges the appropriateness of having quantitative public health guidelines on sedentary behaviour at this time. The authors argue that we still know little about the independent health effects of sitting, and the possibility that sitting is merely the inverse of physical activity remains. While we agree that many questions still need to be addressed in the field of sedentary behaviour research, we feel that providing quantitative recommendations on reducing sedentary behaviour is not premature, is needed, is low risk and is important for public health. Public health approaches to promoting healthy movement should be reconceptualised by considering the full 24-hour period (ie, sleep, sedentary behaviour and all physical activity) rather than focusing on individual behaviours or guidelines. Ignoring the compositional nature of these behaviours (they add up to 24 hours) is misleading, and we need to think in terms of ‘activity mixes’ and healthy ways to compose the day.2–5 In this context, talking about behaviours in isolation of one another is inappropriate, and we should rather think about the optimal mix of behaviours over the whole 24 hours. This integrated approach is supported by recent evidence that used compositional data analysis in their analysis (ie, a statistical approach that deals with the finite nature of the 24-hour …