Research on the importance of the family environment on children’s health behaviors is ubiquitous, yet critical gaps in the literature exist. Many studies have focused on one family characteristic and have relied on variable-centered approaches as opposed to person-centered approaches (e.g., latent profile analysis). The purpose of the current study was to use latent profile analysis to identify family typologies characterized by parental acceptance, parental monitoring, and family conflict, and to examine whether such typologies are associated with the number of movement behavior recommendations (i.e., physical activity, screen time, and sleep) met by children. Data for this cross-sectional observational study were part of the baseline data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study. Data were collected across 21 study sites in the United States. Participants included 10,712 children (female = 5143, males = 5578) aged 9 and 10 years (M = 9.91, SD = 0.62). Results showed that children were meaningfully classified into one of five family typologies. Children from families with high acceptance, medium monitoring, and medium conflict (P2; OR = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.39–0.76); high acceptance, medium monitoring, and high conflict (P3; OR = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.20, 0.40); low acceptance, low monitoring, and medium conflict (P4; OR = 0.24; 95% CI, 0.16, 0.36); and medium acceptance, low monitoring, and high conflict (P5; OR = 0.19; 95% CI, 0.12–0.29) were less likely to meet all three movement behavior recommendations compared to children from families with high acceptance, high monitoring, and low conflict (P1). These findings highlight the importance of the family environment for promoting healthy movement behaviors among children.
No abstract is provided for this article.
Background Active transportation is an important source of physical activity for children and youth. Since 2005, the annual Active Healthy Kids Canada Report Card on Physical Activity for Children and Youth has been a major knowledge translation tool that outlines how Canada is doing in terms of providing physical activity opportunities for children and youth. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the grades for the active transportation indicator over the last 10 years and highlight the best available evidence that informed these grades. Methods Based on an annual review of the Canadian active transportation literature, a panel of experts assigned a grade by consensus to represent the proportion of children and youth engaging in active transportation. Key considerations included the quality of evidence and the presence of disparities (e.g., time-trends, geographic, gender, and socioeconomic differences). A letter-based grading scheme was used to rate the proportion of children and youth that engage in regular active transportation: A, 81%–100%; B, 61%–80%; C, 41%–60%; D, 21%–40%;F, 0%–20%; INC, incomplete data. The grading scheme also incorporated a plus-minus system depending on trends over time and the presence of disparities (i.e., race/ethnicity, disabilities, immigration status, socioeconomic status, geography, gender, and age). Results Over the last 10 years, the active transportation grade has steadily remained at “D”. This is primarily attributable to consistent evidence showing that about 25-35% of Canadian children and youth engage in active transportation to/from school. Conversely, the 2013 Report Card highlighted that the percentage of young Canadians using only motorized modes rose from 51 to 62% between 2000 and 2010. Furthermore, children living in higher socioeconomic status families, in Eastern provinces, in rural areas or in smaller cities were consistently less likely to engage in active transportation to/from school. Conclusions Canada has consistently received D grades for the active transportation indicator due to the low prevalence of active transportation to/from school. Moreover, motorized school travel has increased over the last decade, thereby depriving children of an important source of physical activity. Very few data are available regarding trips to/from other destinations, underscoring a need for future research. The Report Card has been a successful knowledge translation tool that has recently been replicated in several countries around the world.
Age grouping by the imposition of a cut-off date, common in sports and education, promotes a relative age difference that is associated with developmental advantages for children who are born on the "early side" of the cut-off date and disadvantages to those born later in the same year, which is known as the relative age effect (RAE) bias. Acquiring an adequate level of physical literacy is important for children to remain active for life. The Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy (CAPL) is an assessment protocol that encompasses measures in the domains of children's Daily Behaviours, Physical Competence, Motivation and Confidence, and Knowledge and Understanding. The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether the CAPL scores were susceptible to the RAE, which could affect our interpretation of the CAPL findings.This cross-sectional study examined if scores obtained in the CAPL (i.e., the four domains individually and the total CAPL score) were susceptible to the RAE in children aged 8 to 12 years and, if so, which physical competence assessments (movement skills, cardiorespiratory, strength, muscular endurance, flexibility, and body composition measurements) were more susceptible. Participants (n = 8233, 49.8% boys) from the Royal Bank of Canada-CAPL Learn to Play project from 11 sites in seven Canadian provinces were tested using the CAPL protocol.Among boys and girls, the RAE was significantly associated with two and three of the four domain scores, respectively, after controlling for covariates. However, effect sizes were negligible for the comparisons between quarters of the year and physical literacy domains and overall scores. For the main effect of the relative age, boys and girls born in the first three months of the year were taller (F(3, 4074) = 57.0, p < 0.001, ƒ2 = 0.04 and F(3, 4107) = 58.4, p < 0.001, ƒ2 = 0.04, respectively) and demonstrated greater muscular strength (F(3, 4037) = 29.2, p < 0.001, ƒ2 = 0.02 and F(3, 4077) = 25.1, p < 0.001, ƒ2 = 0.02, respectively) compared with those born later in the same year.Collectively, our results suggest that the RAE bias is mainly negligible with regard to the domain scores and overall CAPL scores in this large sample of children.